References

Next: About this document ... Up: High Order Accurate Solutions Previous: Conclusions

References

Morris P.J., Long L.N., Bangalore A. and Wang Q., "A Parallel Three-Dimensional Computational Aerocoustics Method Using Non-Linear Disturbance Equations", J. Computational Physics, 1997 and AIAA 97-1598.

2

Thompson K.W., "Time-Dependent Boundary Conditions for Hyperbolic System", J. of Computational Physics 89, 1990.

3

Tam C.K.W., and Webb, J.C., "Dispersion-Relation-Preserving Finite Difference Schemes for Computational Aeroacoustics," J. of Computational Physics, Vol.1, 1993.

4

ESDU Data Items 74030, 74031, Engineering Sciences Data Unit International, McLean, VA.

5

Healey, J. Val., "The Prospects for Simulating the Helicopter/Ship Interface," Navel Engineers Journal, March 1987, pp. 45-63.

6

Hurst, D. W., and Newman, S.J., "Wind Tunnel Measurements of Ship Induced Turbulence and the Prediction of Helicopter Rotor Blade Response," Vertica, Vol. 12, No.3, 1988, pp. 267-278.

7

Healey, J. Val., "Establishing a Database for Flight in the Wake of Structures," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 29, No.4, July-Aug. 1992, pp. 559-564.

8

Rhoades, M. M., and Healey, J. Val., "Flight Deck Aerodynamics of a Nonaviation Ship," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 29, No.4, July-August 1992, pp. 619-626.

9

Carico, D., Reddy, B., and Dimarzio, C., "Ship Airwake Measurements and Modeling Options for Rotorcraft Applications," In: Aircraft Ship Operations, AGARD CP-509, November 1991.

10

Prasad, J.V.R., Mavris, D.N., and Schrage, D. P., "Ship Airwake Modeling and Simulation, Phase I: Methodology Development," Research Report submitted to Naval Air Warfare Center, School of Aerospace Engineering, Geogia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, August 1992.

11

Williams, S. and Long, K.R., ``Dynamic Interface Testing and the Pilots Rating Scale, The 53rd AHS Forum, April, 1997.

12

Landsberg, A.M., Young, T.R.,Jr. and Boris, J.P., "An efficient, Parallel Method for Solving Flows in Complex Three-Dimensional Geometries", 32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, January 10-13, 1994, Reno, NV.

13

Tai, T.C. and Cario, D., "Simulation of DD-963 Ship Airwake by Navier-Stokes Method", AIAA 93-3002.

14

Bruner, C.W.S. and Walters, W, ``Parallelization of the Euler Equations on Unstructured Grids'', AIAA 97-1894

**Figure 1:** Mach number contour plot around the hangar (horizontal plane)
$\begin{figure} \centerline{ \psfig {figure=mach_k12_m_bw.ps,width=3.4in} }\end{figure}$

**Figure 2:** Mach number contour plot around the hangar (vertical plane)
$\begin{figure} \centerline{ \psfig {figure=mach_j22_m_bw.ps,width=3.4in} }\end{figure}$

**Figure 3:** Flow pattern at 0-deg yaw
$\begin{figure} \centerline{ \psfig {figure=viz.ps,width=3.4in} }\end{figure}$

**Figure 4:** Flow velocity vector on the plane about 17' above deck
$\begin{figure} \centerline{ \psfig {figure=v_lha_45y_k31_bw.ps,width=3.4in} }\end{figure}$

**Figure 5:** Flow velocity vector around landing region
$\begin{figure} \centerline{ \psfig {figure=v_lha_45y_i53_bw.ps,width=3.4in} }\end{figure}$

**Figure 6:** Perturbation Intensity Around the hangar cube
$\begin{figure} \centerline{ \psfig {figure=v_ijk_bw.ps,width=3.4in} }\end{figure}$

**Figure 7:** Perturbation Intensity Around the hangar cube in a vertical plane
$\begin{figure} \centerline{ \psfig {figure=v_j22_bw.ps,width=3.4in} }\end{figure}$

**Figure 8:** Perturbation intensity around landing region
$\begin{figure} \centerline{ \psfig {figure=lha45y_i49.eps,width=3.4in} }\end{figure}$

Anirudh Modi
2/26/1998